Skip links menu. Some links may not be available on all pages, for example section navigation may not be available on the home or landing pages.
In this section you indicate the purpose of the report.
This shows what the report includes and excludes. For example:
This feasibility study indicates the environmental feasibility of the proposed damming of the Blue River between Johnson's Creek and Blackstump Creek. It does not include building specifications of the dam itself. A further proposal would be offered if council decides to proceed with the recommendations of this study.
This section contains any relevant details regarding the background information that may be needed to make sense of the information in the report. It may outline the history of a project, or major players in the project. For example:
In January 2008, Kalkadoo township experienced severe water shortages as a result of prolonged drought periods during 2005 and 2006. The Kalkadoo Shire Council has made it a priority for this situation to be remedied so that this situation does not occur in the future. The Shire Council had conducted investigations into providing a dam for the region in the late-1980s but plans were halted due to public dissatisfaction with the outcome of those investigations. Further environmental studies needed to be conducted over a longer period to determine the impact of the dam on neighbouring farms and Crown land reserves. This series of investigations was completed in December 2003. The outcome suggested no significant negative environmental or economic impacts would be felt. In June 2004, the Shire Council proposed that the final stages of the feasibility study should be conducted, and conclusions and recommendations from the entire study should be tabled at Council's Planning Committee meeting scheduled for 12 January 2005. This feasibility study report should thus enable Council to make a final decision regarding improving water supplies to the Shire. This is one of its three priority areas for the period 2004-2009.
In this section, you would briefly outline how you collected the data that will provide the basis for analysis that will produce conclusions and recommendations. Even though it may be called something different, all reports use specific data and ways of collecting it that would be included in this section.
During this six-month feasibility study, data were collected and analysed according to the criteria outlined for environmental impact studies as set out in the Queensland Department of Primary Industry's Environmental Studies Handbook (2003). Water flow rates were measured according to rate of flow 100 ml per hour. These rates were recorded three times per week during the study. Sediment and salinity levels were measured according to the percentage of suspended siltation carried in the fastest flowing section of the river channel. These measurements were also taken three times per week, and more often during the change of tides. Fish stock numbers were recorded once per month where tagged fish were counted and measured. Specific areas within the study region were targeted and fish stock numbers randomly checked using sonar equipment. Weed infiltration rates were recorded, both in the river itself, and in the land regions that would be directly affected by flooding. Weekly recordings were made of the types of species already present in the areas of study, and identification of new varieties was monitored.
This section is perhaps the longest section in most reports and it is where, using visual displays, you outline the data you have collected.
Table 1: Water flow rates—Blue River, 1 June 2003 – 7 December 2003
| Date | Time | Volume/Hour | 100 ml/Hour | Recommended flow rate for viable damming |
The table indicates that periods of peak flow occurred between July and September 2003. The rates of flow are 50% higher than those rates recommended to be viable for substantial damming of an area. The lowest flow recorded occurred during November but is still significantly higher than the recommended flow rate for viable damming. There is no evidence to suggest that these levels are unusual for this region. Table 2 compares water flow rates for the same periods from studies conducted over the period 1999-2001. (See Table 2, page 12.) This indicates that the water flow rates are stable and there is very little variation from year to year or month to month.
The conclusions are dot pointed and are drawn directly from the analysis section of the report. Dot points are used when the sequential order is not important. For each section under the main heading 'Analysis', there should be at least one corresponding conclusion. For example:
These are your suggestions for further action based on your conclusions. Not all reports will ask for recommendations. Some will have a section where both conclusions and recommendations are given. Recommendations are numbered as they normally follow sequentially. For example:
A reference list with publication details of sources used should be included after the conclusions/recommendations section. Any appendices follow the reference list.