Breadcrumb Links:

Parts of the Report

Introduction

Aim

In this section you indicate the purpose of the report.

Scope

This shows what the report includes and excludes. For example:

This feasibility study indicates the environmental feasibility of the proposed damming of the Blue River between Johnson's Creek and Blackstump Creek. It does not include building specifications of the dam itself. A further proposal would be offered if council decides to proceed with the recommendations of this study.

Background to study

This section contains any relevant details regarding the background information that may be needed to make sense of the information in the report. It may outline the history of a project, or major players in the project. For example:

In January 2008, Kalkadoo township experienced severe water shortages as a result of prolonged drought periods during 2005 and 2006. The Kalkadoo Shire Council has made it a priority for this situation to be remedied so that this situation does not occur in the future. The Shire Council had conducted investigations into providing a dam for the region in the late-1980s but plans were halted due to public dissatisfaction with the outcome of those investigations. Further environmental studies needed to be conducted over a longer period to determine the impact of the dam on neighbouring farms and Crown land reserves. This series of investigations was completed in December 2003. The outcome suggested no significant negative environmental or economic impacts would be felt. In June 2004, the Shire Council proposed that the final stages of the feasibility study should be conducted, and conclusions and recommendations from the entire study should be tabled at Council's Planning Committee meeting scheduled for 12 January 2005. This feasibility study report should thus enable Council to make a final decision regarding improving water supplies to the Shire. This is one of its three priority areas for the period 2004-2009.

Data collection methods

In this section, you would briefly outline how you collected the data that will provide the basis for analysis that will produce conclusions and recommendations. Even though it may be called something different, all reports use specific data and ways of collecting it that would be included in this section.

  • In research reports, you would probably use a different heading because your data would come mainly from texts and journal articles. This is the section where you would discuss the main issues arising from your research.
  • In reports that are based on data you have collected yourself, like the report used in the example so far, this section would detail the methods you used to collect that data and why those methods were chosen. You would also outline the steps taken during the process of collecting data and carrying out research. An example is set out below:

    During this six-month feasibility study, data were collected and analysed according to the criteria outlined for environmental impact studies as set out in the Queensland Department of Primary Industry's Environmental Studies Handbook (2003). Water flow rates were measured according to rate of flow 100 ml per hour. These rates were recorded three times per week during the study. Sediment and salinity levels were measured according to the percentage of suspended siltation carried in the fastest flowing section of the river channel. These measurements were also taken three times per week, and more often during the change of tides. Fish stock numbers were recorded once per month where tagged fish were counted and measured. Specific areas within the study region were targeted and fish stock numbers randomly checked using sonar equipment. Weed infiltration rates were recorded, both in the river itself, and in the land regions that would be directly affected by flooding. Weekly recordings were made of the types of species already present in the areas of study, and identification of new varieties was monitored.

Analysis of data

This section is perhaps the longest section in most reports and it is where, using visual displays, you outline the data you have collected.

  • Graphs, charts, tables, maps, graphic displays should always be used to summarise the findings you have made from the data you have collected.
  • Each set of data may be displayed in more than one way and each diagram or visual should have a title, figure or table number, and should be clearly labelled.
  • Each set of data is systematically displayed and analysed in a paragraph under the appropriate diagram. For example:

Water flow rates

Table 1: Water flow rates—Blue River, 1 June 2003 7 December 2003

Date Time Volume/Hour 100 ml/Hour Recommended flow rate for viable damming
         
         

The table indicates that periods of peak flow occurred between July and September 2003. The rates of flow are 50% higher than those rates recommended to be viable for substantial damming of an area. The lowest flow recorded occurred during November but is still significantly higher than the recommended flow rate for viable damming. There is no evidence to suggest that these levels are unusual for this region. Table 2 compares water flow rates for the same periods from studies conducted over the period 1999-2001. (See Table 2, page 12.) This indicates that the water flow rates are stable and there is very little variation from year to year or month to month.

Conclusions

The conclusions are dot pointed and are drawn directly from the analysis section of the report. Dot points are used when the sequential order is not important. For each section under the main heading 'Analysis', there should be at least one corresponding conclusion. For example:

  • The Blue River flow rate is significantly higher than was expected. Damming the Blue River between Johnson's Creek and Blackstump Creek would not affect average water flow rates upstream or downstream from this area.
  • Sediment levels remained between 0.02% and 0.05% during the dry months. Sediment levels of 1.2% are considered to be acceptable. Damming the river will not significantly increase sedimentation downstream. Upstream, sediment levels will increase between 0.5% and 1.0%. This increase is still within the acceptable range according to guidelines (given by the Department of Primary Industries).

Recommendations

These are your suggestions for further action based on your conclusions. Not all reports will ask for recommendations. Some will have a section where both conclusions and recommendations are given. Recommendations are numbered as they normally follow sequentially. For example:

  1. The damming of the Blue River between Johnson's Creek and Blackstump Creek should proceed.
  2. Damming of this area could lead to significant economic advantages.

References

A reference list with publication details of sources used should be included after the conclusions/recommendations section. Any appendices follow the reference list.


Click on the following links for information about: